Brilliant Violet 421™ anti-mouse CD45 Antibody

Product Details

Verified Reactivity

Mouse

Antibody Type

Monoclonal

Host Species

Rat

Immunogen

Mouse thymus or spleen

Formulation

Phosphate-buffered solution, pH 7.2, containing 0.09% sodium azide and BSA (origin USA).

Preparation

The antibody was purified by affinity chromatography and conjugated with Brilliant Violet 421™ under optimal conditions.

Concentration

µg sizes: 0.2 mg/mL
µL sizes: lot-specific (to obtain lot-specific concentration and expiration, please enter the lot number in our Certificate of Analysis online tool.)

Storage & Handling

The antibody solution should be stored undiluted between 2°C and 8°C, and protected from prolonged exposure to light. Do not freeze.

Application

FC - Quality tested

SB - Reported in the literature, not verified in house

Recommended Usage

Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by immunofluorescent staining with flow cytometric analysis. For immunofluorescent staining using the µg size, the suggested use of this reagent is ≤0.25 µg per million cells in 100 µl volume. For immunofluorescent staining using the µl size, the suggested use of this reagent is 5 µl per million cells in 100 µl staining volume or 5 µl per 100 µl of whole blood. It is recommended that the reagent be titrated for optimal performance for each application.

Brilliant Violet 421™ excites at 405 nm and emits at 421 nm. The standard bandpass filter 450/50 nm is recommended for detection. Brilliant Violet 421™ is a trademark of Sirigen Group Ltd.

Learn more about Brilliant Violet™.

This product is subject to proprietary rights of Sirigen Inc. and is made and sold under license from Sirigen Inc. The purchase of this product conveys to the buyer a non-transferable right to use the purchased product for research purposes only. This product may not be resold or incorporated in any manner into another product for resale. Any use for therapeutics or diagnostics is strictly prohibited. This product is covered by U.S. Patent(s), pending patent applications and foreign equivalents.

Excitation Laser

Violet Laser (405 nm)

Application Notes

Clone 30-F11 reacts with all isoforms and both CD45.1 and CD45.2 alloantigens of CD45.

Additional reported applications (for relevant formats) include: immunoprecipitation³, complement-dependent cytotoxicity^1,5, immunohistochemistry (acetone-fixed frozen sections, zinc-fixed paraffin-embedded sections and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections)^4,6, Western blotting⁷, and spatial biology (IBEX)^10,11. The Ultra-LEAF™ purified antibody (Endotoxin < 0.01 EU/µg, Azide-Free, 0.2 µm filtered) is recommended for functional assays (Cat. No. 103163 and 103164).

Additional Product Notes

Iterative Bleaching Extended multi-pleXity (IBEX) is a fluorescent imaging technique capable of highly-multiplexed spatial analysis. The method relies on cyclical bleaching of panels of fluorescent antibodies in order to image and analyze many markers over multiple cycles of staining, imaging, and, bleaching. It is a community-developed open-access method developed by the Center for Advanced Tissue Imaging (CAT-I) in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID, NIH).

Application References

1. Podd BS, et al. 2006. J. Immunol. 176:6532. (FC, CMCD) PubMed
2. Haynes NM, et al. 2007. J. Immunol. 179:5099. (FC)
3. Ledbetter JA, et al. 1979. Immunol. Rev. 47:63. (IP)
4. Simon DI, et al. 2000. J. Clin. Invest. 105:293. (IHC)
5. Seaman WE. 1983. J. Immunol. 130:1713. (CMCD)
6. Cornet A, et al. 2001. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:13306. (IHC)
7. Tsuboi S and Fukuda M. 1998. J. Biol. Chem. 273:30680. (WB) PubMed
8. Liu F, et al. 2012. Blood. 119:3295. PubMed
9. Pelletier AN, et al. 2012. J. Immunol. 188:5561. PubMed
10. Radtke AJ, et al. 2020. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117:33455-65. (SB) PubMed
11. Radtke AJ, et al. 2022. Nat Protoc. 17:378-401. (SB) PubMed

Product Citations

1. Zahr A, et al. 2016. Nat Commun. 7:10363. PubMed
2. Naito H, et al. 2020. Nature Protocols. 15(3):1066-1081. PubMed
3. Schlecht A, et al. 2021. Int J Mol Sci. 22:. PubMed
4. Cullis J, et al. 2017. Cancer Immunol Res. 5:182. PubMed
5. Ulland TK et al. 2017. Cell. 170(4):649-663 . PubMed
6. Barrow AD et al. 2018. Cell. 172(3):534-548 . PubMed
7. Galán-Díez M, et al. 2022. Cancer Discov. . PubMed
8. Sharma GP, et al. 2021. PLoS One. 16:e0259042. PubMed
9. Deng J, et al. 2021. JCI Insight. 6:146133. PubMed
10. Aguilera T, et al. 2016. Nat Commun. 7:13898. PubMed
11. Kurelac I, et al. 2019. Nat Commun. 10:903. PubMed
12. Karlen SJ, et al. 2018. J Neuroinflammation. 15:344. PubMed
13. Saleh MM, et al. 2019. Cell Host Microbe. 25:756. PubMed
14. Kobayashi T, et al. 2019. Cell. 176:982. PubMed
15. Lee H, et al. 2020. Cell Metabolism. 31(4):822-836. PubMed
16. Karlsson J, et al. 2021. Adv Funct Mater. 31:. PubMed
17. Delacher M, et al. 2021. Immunity. 54(4):702-720.e17. PubMed
18. Zheng H, et al. 2021. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 9:641527. PubMed
19. Song WM, et al. 2018. J Exp Med. 215:745. PubMed
20. Shmeleva EV, et al. 2019. Front Immunol. 10:1780. PubMed
21. Bratti M, et al. 2022. Front Immunol. 13:1029759. PubMed
22. Cui Z, et al. 2022. Bone Res. 10:58. PubMed
23. Nagatake T, et al. 2022. Mucosal Immunol. 15:289. PubMed
24. Webster HC, et al. 2020. J Immunol Methods. 112702:477. PubMed
25. Crncec I, et al. 2018. Mol Oncol. 12:514. PubMed
26. Kobayashi H, et al. 2020. STAR Protoc. 1:100078. PubMed
27. Schlecht A, et al. 2021. Front Cell Dev Biol. 8:618598. PubMed
28. Mathur S, et al. 2021. JCI Insight. 6:. PubMed
29. Bell BJ, et al. 2022. Brain Behav Immun Health. 23:100478. PubMed
30. Helm M, et al. 2022. Life (Basel). 12:. PubMed
31. Nishiga Y, et al. 2022. Nat Cancer. 3:1351. PubMed
32. Suter EC, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 36(8):109587. PubMed
33. Mittal S, et al. 2016. Stem Cell Reports. 7:583-590. PubMed
34. Saika A, et al. 2020. FASEB Bioadv. 2:59. PubMed
35. Chu C, et al. 2016. Dis Model Mech. 9: 473-481. PubMed
36. Hagan AS, et al. 2020. Development. 147:00:00. PubMed
37. Kramann R, et al. 2018. JCI Insight. 3. PubMed
38. Parlet CP, et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 27:187. PubMed
39. Jiang H, et al. 2021. Oncoimmunology. 10:1943180. PubMed
40. Miller EB, et al. 2021. J Neuroinflammation. 18:235. PubMed
41. Haase C, et al. 2022. Nat Methods. 19:1622. PubMed
42. Pan YC, et al. 2021. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 20:175. PubMed
43. Li J, et al. 2020. Elife. 9:00. PubMed
44. Li Q, et al. 2019. Front Cell Neurosci. 12:520. PubMed
45. Mamedov MR, et al. 2018. Immunity. 48:350. PubMed
46. Agalave NM, et al. 2021. Front Immunol. 12:642420. PubMed
47. Katara GK, et al. 2020. Mol Oncol. 0.729861111. PubMed
48. de Lucía Finkel P, et al. 2021. Sci Rep. 11:12233. PubMed
49. Guldner IH, et al. 2020. Cell. 183(5):1234-1248.e25. PubMed
50. Engler AE, et al. 2020. Cell Reports. 33(13):108553. PubMed
51. Boeck M, et al. 2020. Glia. 1859:68. PubMed
52. Deczkowska A, et al. 2017. Nat Commun. 8:717. PubMed
53. Carbone C, et al. 2021. J Immunother Cancer. 9:. PubMed
54. Aktories P, et al. 2022. Cell Rep Methods. 2:100260. PubMed
55. Dobson HE, et al. 2020. Mucosal Immunol. 0.901388889. PubMed
56. Bersini S, et al. 2020. Life Sci Alliance. 3:e201900623. PubMed
57. Durré T, et al. 2018. Nat Commun. 9:5178. PubMed
58. Perdigoto AL, et al. 2022. JCI Insight. 7:. PubMed
59. Chuang CH, et al. 2020. Cancer Research. 81:567. PubMed
60. Ma Z, et al. 2022. Methods Mol Biol. 2471:49. PubMed
61. Hirata SI, et al. 2020. Allergy. 75:1939. PubMed
62. Goh W, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 33:108285. PubMed
63. Dahlgren MW et al. 2019. Immunity. 50(3):707-722 . PubMed
64. Nagatake T, et al. 2018. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 142:470. PubMed
65. Zwick M, et al. 2019. Front Immunol. 10:222. PubMed
66. Sakamoto K, et al. 2021. Immunity. 54:2321. PubMed
67. Zhang P, et al. 2021. J Neuroinflammation. 18:215. PubMed
68. Yi H, et al. 2021. Front Immunol. 12:719189. PubMed
69. Wieghofer P, et al. 2021. EMBO J. 40:e105123. PubMed
70. Shibuya M, et al. 2021. iScience. 24:103131. PubMed
71. Zhang X, et al. 2021. Front Pharmacol. 12:629513. PubMed
72. Ben-Yehuda H, et al. 2021. Mol Neurodegener. 16:39. PubMed
73. Wakabayashi T et al. 2018. Cell stem cell. 22(3):384-397 . PubMed
74. Mao W, et al. 2019. J Immunother Cancer. 0.484027778. PubMed
75. Zheng X, et al. 2020. Int J Cancer. 146:1730. PubMed
76. Hoover AR, et al. 2022. Clin Transl Med. 12:e937. PubMed
77. Zhang Y, et al. 2021. Commun Biol. 344:4. PubMed
78. Di Pilato M, et al. 2021. Cell. 184(17):4512-4530.e22. PubMed
79. Glodde N et al. 2017. Immunity. 47(4):789-802 . PubMed
80. Meng Michelle Xu et al. 2017. Immunity. 47(2):363-373 . PubMed
81. Süß P, et al. 2020. Cell Reports. 30(12):4082-4095. PubMed
82. Ombrato L, et al. 2021. Nat Protoc. 16:872. PubMed
83. Siolas D, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 36:109578. PubMed
84. Dubrot J, et al. 2021. Immunity. 54(3):571-585.e6. PubMed
85. Li X, et al. 2022. Oncoimmunology. 11:2118210. PubMed
86. Celorrio M, et al. 2022. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 10:10. PubMed
87. Nagatake T, et al. 2021. Int Immunol. 33:171. PubMed
88. Sakamoto K, et al. 2022. STAR Protoc. 3:101052. PubMed
89. Hu B, et al. 2020. J Clin Invest. 130:3483. PubMed
90. Dinh HQ, et al. 2020. Immunity. 53(2):319-334.e6. PubMed
91. Nishimura T, et al. 2020. Cell Stem Cell. 28(1):141-149.e3. PubMed
92. Usui-Ouchi A, et al. 2020. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 28297:117. PubMed
93. Boddupalli CS, et al. 2022. Elife. 11:. PubMed
94. Palma A, et al. 2022. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10:841548. PubMed
95. Omori S, et al. 2020. Cell Metabolism. 32(5):814-828.e6. PubMed
96. Zheng H, et al. 2021. Frontiers in Immunology. 12:645100. PubMed
97. Liu Q, et al. 2016. Cell Death Dis. 1.93125. PubMed
98. Scheyltjens I, et al. 2022. Nat Protoc. 17:2354. PubMed

RRID

AB_10899570 (BioLegend Cat. No. 103133)
AB_2562559 (BioLegend Cat. No. 103134)

Antigen Details

Structure

Protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) family, 180-240 kD

Distribution

All hematopoietic cells except mature erythrocytes and platelets

Function

Phosphatase, T and B cell activation

Ligand/Receptor

Galectin-1, CD2, CD3, CD4, TCR, CD22, Thy-1

Cell Type

B cells, Dendritic cells, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Tregs

Biology Area

Cell Biology, Immunology, Inhibitory Molecules, Innate Immunity, Neuroscience, Neuroscience Cell Markers, Stem Cells

Molecular Family

CD Molecules

Antigen References

1. Barclay A, et al. 1997. The Leukocyte Antigen FactsBook Academic Press.
2. Trowbridge IS, et al. 1993. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:85.
3. Kishihara K, et al. 1993. Cell 74:143.
4. Pulido R, et al. 1988. J. Immunol. 140:3851.

Gene ID

19264 View all products for this Gene ID

UniProt

View information about CD45 on UniProt.org

Documentation

• Technical Data Sheet (pdf)
• Certificate of Analysis
• Material Safety Data Sheet

Reviews

Related Protocols

• Cell Surface Flow Cytometry Staining Protocol

Related Pages & Pathways

Related FAQs

What is the F/P ratio range of our BV421™ format antibody reagents?

It is lot-specific. On average it ranges between 2-4.

If an antibody clone has been previously successfully used in IBEX in one fluorescent format, will other antibody formats work as well?

It’s likely that other fluorophore conjugates to the same antibody clone will also be compatible with IBEX using the same sample fixation procedure. Ultimately a directly conjugated antibody’s utility in fluorescent imaging and IBEX may be specific to the sample and microscope being used in the experiment. Some antibody clone conjugates may perform better than others due to performance differences in non-specific binding, fluorophore brightness, and other biochemical properties unique to that conjugate.

Will antibodies my lab is already using for fluorescent or chromogenic IHC work in IBEX?

Fundamentally, IBEX as a technique that works much in the same way as single antibody panels or single marker IF/IHC. If you’re already successfully using an antibody clone on a sample of interest, it is likely that clone will have utility in IBEX. It is expected some optimization and testing of different antibody fluorophore conjugates will be required to find a suitable format; however, legacy microscopy techniques like chromogenic IHC on fixed or frozen tissue is an excellent place to start looking for useful antibodies.

Are other fluorophores compatible with IBEX?

Over 18 fluorescent formats have been screened for use in IBEX, however, it is likely that other fluorophores are able to be rapidly bleached in IBEX. If a fluorophore format is already suitable for your imaging platform it can be tested for compatibility in IBEX.

The same antibody works in one tissue type but not another. What is happening?

Differences in tissue properties may impact both the ability of an antibody to bind its target specifically and impact the ability of a specific fluorophore conjugate to overcome the background fluorescent signal in a given tissue. Secondary stains, as well as testing multiple fluorescent conjugates of the same clone, may help to troubleshoot challenging targets or tissues. Using a reference control tissue may also give confidence in the specificity of your staining.

How can I be sure the staining I’m seeing in my tissue is real?

In general, best practices for validating an antibody in traditional chromogenic or fluorescent IHC are applicable to IBEX. Please reference the Nature Methods review on antibody based multiplexed imaging for resources on validating antibodies for IBEX.

Other Formats

Certificate of Analysis