Loading...

Biotin anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells Antibody

Pricing & Availability
Clone
TER-119 (See other available formats)
Regulatory Status
RUO
Other Names
Ly-76
Isotype
Rat IgG2b, κ
Ave. Rating
Submit a Review
Product Citations
publications
TER-119_Biotin_TER-119_Antibody_FC_041713
C57BL/6 bone marrow cells were stained with biotinylated TER-119 (filled histogram) or biotinylated rat IgG2b, κ isotype control (open histogram) and then detected with Sav-PE.
  • TER-119_Biotin_TER-119_Antibody_FC_041713
    C57BL/6 bone marrow cells were stained with biotinylated TER-119 (filled histogram) or biotinylated rat IgG2b, κ isotype control (open histogram) and then detected with Sav-PE.
Compare all formats
Cat # Size Price Quantity Check Availability Save
116203 50 µg 38€
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
116204 500 µg 106€
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
Description

The TER-119 antigen is a 52 kD glycophorin A-associated protein, also known as Ly-76. TER-119 is an erythroid-specific antigen expressed on early proerythroblasts to mature erythrocytes, but not on erythroid colony-forming cells (BFU-E, blast-forming unit erythroid, or CFU-E, colony-forming unit erythroid).

Product Details
Technical data sheet

Product Details

Verified Reactivity
Mouse
Antibody Type
Monoclonal
Host Species
Rat
Immunogen
Day-14 fetal liver cells from a C57BL/6 mouse
Formulation
Phosphate-buffered solution, pH 7.2, containing 0.09% sodium azide.
Preparation
The antibody was purified by affinity chromatography, and conjugated with biotin under optimal conditions.
Concentration
0.5 mg/ml
Storage & Handling
The antibody solution should be stored undiluted between 2°C and 8°C. Do not freeze.
Application

FC - Quality tested
Recommended Usage

Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by immunofluorescent staining with flow cytometric analysis. For flow cytometric staining, the suggested use of this reagent is ≤ 0.25 µg per 106 cells in 100 µl volume. It is recommended that the reagent be titrated for optimal performance for each application.

Application Notes

The TER-119 antibody is useful for distinguishing erythrocytes and cells in the erythroid lineage. Additional reported applications (for the relevant formats) include: immunoprecipitation1, Western blotting1, complement-mediated cytotoxicity3, and immunohistochemical staining of acetone-fixed frozen sections and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections. Ultra-LEAF™ purified antibody (Endotoxin < 0.01 EU/µg, Azide-Free, 0.2 µm filtered) is recommended for functional assays (Cat. No. 116253-116258).

Application References

(PubMed link indicates BioLegend citation)
  1. Kina T, et al. 2000. Br. J. Haematol. 109:280. (IP, WB)
  2. Vannucchi AM, et al. 2000. Blood 95:2559.
  3. Maraskovsky E, et al. 1996. J. Exp. Med. 184:1953. (CMCD)
  4. Grisendi S, et al. 2005. Nature 437:147. (FC)
  5. Bourdeau A, et al. 2007. Blood 109:4220.
  6. Chappaz S, et al. 2007. Blood 110:3862. (FC)
  7. Heuser M, et al. 2007. Blood 110:1639. (FC)
  8. Gough SM, et al. 2014. Cancer Discov. 4:564. PubMed
Product Citations
  1. Grigsby SM, et al. 2021. Cancers (Basel). 13:. PubMed
  2. Drobek A, et al. 2015. J Immunol. 195: 3416 - 3426. PubMed
  3. Hu J, et al. 2019. Am J Transl Res. 3.043055556. PubMed
  4. Wu J, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:7321. PubMed
  5. Florentin J, et al. 2022. Front Immunol. 13:882484. PubMed
  6. Schloss MJ, et al. 2022. Nat Immunol. 23:605. PubMed
  7. Guo F, et al. 2022. Front Immunol. 13:833100. PubMed
  8. Lv X, et al. 2022. Acta Pharm Sin B. 12:735. PubMed
  9. Davis FM, et al. 2020. J Immunol. 2503:204. PubMed
  10. Bouchareychas L, et al. 2021. iScience. 24(8):102847. PubMed
  11. Kim S, et al. 2020. Immunity. 53(4):759-774.e9. PubMed
  12. Geiger SS, et al. 2021. Nature Communications. 12(1):2745. PubMed
  13. Han X, et al. 2017. Int J Mol Sci. 10.3390/ijms18050942. PubMed
  14. Domingues AF, et al. 2020. Elife. 9:e51754. PubMed
  15. Zhu C, et al. 2018. Sci Rep. 5.113194444. PubMed
  16. Tanimura N et al. 2018. Developmental cell. 46(5):581-594 . PubMed
  17. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez Ó, et al. 2021. EMBO Rep. 22:e52905. PubMed
  18. Matsumoto R, et al. 2021. Front Pharmacol. 12:715752. PubMed
  19. Tian M, et al. 2020. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117:7929. PubMed
  20. Preglej T, et al. 2020. JCI Insight. 5(4):. PubMed
  21. Riether C, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 34(4):108663. PubMed
  22. Krueger PD, et al. 2021. Immunity. 54(4):687-701.e4. PubMed
  23. Postat J et al. 2018. Immunity. 49(4):654-665 . PubMed
  24. Yu VWC et al. 2016. Cell. 167(5):1310-1322 . PubMed
  25. Hodzic D, et al. 2022. PLoS Biol. 20:e3001811. PubMed
  26. Yang X, et al. 2020. Blood Sci. 2:89. PubMed
  27. Pokrovskii M, et al. 2020. EMBO J. 39:e104159. PubMed
  28. Hinterbrandner M, et al. 2021. JCI Insight. 6:e151797. PubMed
  29. Iturri L, et al. 2021. Immunity. . PubMed
  30. de Mingo Pulido , et al. 2021. Immunity. 54(6):1154-1167.e7. PubMed
  31. Browning LM, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 33:108219. PubMed
  32. Fu R, et al. 2019. Nat Commun. 10:3210. PubMed
  33. Álvaro de Mingo Pulido et al. 2018. Cancer cell. 33(1):60-74 . PubMed
  34. Zong L, et al. 2021. NPJ Aging Mech Dis. 7:25. PubMed
  35. Verena Sigl et al. 2017. Cell research. 26(7):761-74 . PubMed
  36. Liu X, et al. 2021. eLife. 0.416666666666667. PubMed
  37. Yamamoto K, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 36(8):109576. PubMed
  38. Li Q et al. 2018. Immunity. 48(2):258-270 . PubMed
  39. Mann M, et al. 2018. Cell Rep. 25:2992. PubMed
  40. Zhao M, et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 26:652. PubMed
  41. Davis FM, et al. 2019. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 39:2353. PubMed
  42. Fukushima T, et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 29:4144. PubMed
  43. She L, et al. 2021. JCI Insight. 6:e143509. PubMed
  44. Sitaraman S, et al. 2021. JCI Insight. 6:. PubMed
  45. Paiva RS, et al. 2021. Eur J Immunol. 51:1968. PubMed
  46. Liu YY, et al. 2020. Chin Med J (Engl). 133:1688. PubMed
  47. Olsson A, et al. 2016. Nature. 10.1038/nature19348. PubMed
  48. Dey A et al. 2019. The EMBO journal. 38(7) pii: e100293. PubMed
  49. Kimball A, et al. 2018. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 38:1102. PubMed
  50. Wang L, et al. 2021. Cancer Immunol Res. 9:348. PubMed
  51. Kurkewich J, et al. 2016. PLoS One. 11: 0161468. PubMed
  52. Jassinskaja M, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 34(12):108894. PubMed
  53. Levine LS, et al. 2021. Immunity. 54(4):829-844.e5. PubMed
  54. Paiva RA, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 35(2):108967. PubMed
  55. Shimokawa C et al. 2017. Immunity. 46(5):863-874 . PubMed
  56. Haase C, et al. 2022. Nat Methods. 19:1622. PubMed
  57. Lopez DA, et al. 2022. Cell Rep. 41:111677. PubMed
  58. Kawakami R, et al. 2021. Immunity. 54(5):947-961.e8. PubMed
  59. Hurrell BP, et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 29:4509. PubMed
  60. Yu VWC, et al. 2017. Cell. 168:944. PubMed
  61. Kimball AS et al. 2019. Immunity. 51(2):258-271 . PubMed
  62. Onodera T, et al. 2019. J Immunol. 203:3282. PubMed
  63. Xu L et al. 2017. Immunity. 47(3):538-551 . PubMed
  64. Cheng HW, et al. 2019. Nat Commun. 10:1739. PubMed
  65. Chen X et al. 2017. Cell stem cell. 21(6):747-760 . PubMed
  66. Dong S, et al. 2021. Nature. 591:117. PubMed
  67. Progatzky F, et al. 2021. Nature. 599:125. PubMed
  68. Zhu H, et al. 2020. J Bone Miner Res. 35:698. PubMed
  69. Chatterjee S, et al. 2014. PLoS One. 9:87858. PubMed
  70. Ludwik KA, et al. 2021. STAR Protocols. 2(1):100270. PubMed
  71. Derecka M, et al. 2020. Nat Immunol. 261:21. PubMed
  72. Peraki I, Palis J, and Mavrothalassitis G. 2017. Mol Cell Biol. 10.1128/MCB.00183-17. PubMed
  73. Greenwald AC, et al. 2019. J Exp Med. 216:215. PubMed
  74. Hulsmans M et al. 2017. Cell. 169(3):510-522 . PubMed
  75. Lin C, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:6869. PubMed
  76. Onodera T, et al. 2021. Immunity. 54:2385. PubMed
  77. Milner JJ, et al. 2020. Immunity. 52(5):808-824.e7. PubMed
  78. Frodermann V, et al. 2019. Nat Med. 25:1761. PubMed
  79. Schoeler K, et al. 2019. FEBS J. 10.1111/febs.14934. PubMed
  80. Alameh MG, et al. 2021. Immunity. 54:2877. PubMed
  81. Lüönd F, et al. 2022. STAR Protoc. 3:101438. PubMed
  82. Lebert-Ghali C, et al. 2016. Blood. 127: 87-90. PubMed
  83. Trefzer A, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 34(6):108748. PubMed
  84. Sitaraman S, et al. 2019. Sci Rep. 9:12509. PubMed
  85. Galle-Treger L, et al. 2020. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 145:502. PubMed
  86. Yi W, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 34(13):108922. PubMed
  87. Andersen L, et al. 2020. Cell Reports. 29(13):4447-4459.e6.. PubMed
  88. Kubota S, et al. 2019. Nat Commun. 10:1653. PubMed
  89. Wang C, et al. 2018. J Clin Invest. 128:3872. PubMed
  90. Chen Z, et al. 2019. J Exp Med. 216:152. PubMed
  91. Sevin M, et al. 2018. Nat Commun. 9:1431. PubMed
  92. Zhai X, et al. 2021. Sci Adv. 7:eabk0490. PubMed
  93. Gamrekelashvili J, et al. 2021. Bio Protoc. 11:e4007. PubMed
  94. Galle-Treger L, et al. 2019. Nat Commun. 10:713. PubMed
  95. Balzano M et al. 2019. Cell reports. 26(12):3257-3271 . PubMed
  96. Goldstein JM et al. 2019. Cell reports. 27(4):1254-1264 . PubMed
  97. Yang BH, et al. 2020. Cell Reports. 27(12):3629-3645.e6.. PubMed
  98. Akkaya B, et al. 2017. J Immunol Methods. 441:67. PubMed
  99. Lehrke MJ, et al. 2021. Elife. 10:. PubMed
  100. Fujii T, et al. 2021. Bone Res. 9:4. PubMed
  101. Gu VW, et al. 2021. Stem Cell Reports. 16:106. PubMed
  102. Zeis P, et al. 2020. Immunity. 53:775. PubMed
  103. Nasarre P, et al. 2021. Cancers (Basel). 13: . PubMed
  104. Kanemaru K, et al. 2015. PLoS One. 10: 0144436. PubMed
  105. Frohner IE, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 30:3171. PubMed
  106. Bagadia P, et al. 2019. Nat Immunol. 20:1174. PubMed
  107. Vasamsetti SB, et al. 2018. Immunity. 49:93. PubMed
  108. Duarte D, et al. 2018. Cell Stem Cell. 22:64. PubMed
  109. Schönberger K, et al. 2022. STAR Protoc. 3:101408. PubMed
  110. Zhang MH, et al. 2020. Front Immunol. 11:560. PubMed
  111. Alexander K, et al. 2016. Immunol Cell Biol. 95:7-16. PubMed
  112. Christin JR, et al. 2020. Cell Reports. 31(10):107742. PubMed
  113. Kimball AS, et al. 2020. Thromb Haemost. 120:289. PubMed
  114. Adachi Y, et al. 2019. Nat Commun. 10:3883. PubMed
  115. Maroni G, et al. 2019. Int J Mol Sci. 20. PubMed
  116. Nagashima H et al. 2019. Immunity. 51(4):682-695 . PubMed
  117. Buffolo M, et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 29:270. PubMed
  118. Fu NY, et al. 2018. Dev Cell. 47:629. PubMed
  119. Hasenberg M, et al. 2011. PLoS One. 6:e17314. PubMed
  120. Bajaña S, et al. 2022. iScience. 25:103732. PubMed
  121. Koide S, et al. 2022. iScience. 25:103603. PubMed
  122. Miyauchi K, et al. 2021. Nat Commun. 12:3789. PubMed
  123. Yokomizo-Nakano T, et al. 2020. Cancer Res. 80:2523. PubMed
  124. He M, et al. 2020. Cell Metabolism. 31(3):580-591. PubMed
  125. Wolock SL, et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 28:302. PubMed
  126. Mohrin M, et al. 2021. Aging Cell. 20:e13313. PubMed
  127. Anderson DA, et al. 2022. J Exp Med. 219:. PubMed
  128. Rai S, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:5346. PubMed
  129. Michel A, et al. 2013. J Immunol. 90:5534. PubMed
  130. Lefkopoulos S, et al. 2020. Immunity. 53(5):934-951.e9. PubMed
  131. Zhang C, et al. 2018. Cell Res. 28:323. PubMed
  132. Park DS, et al. 2019. PLoS Comput Biol. 15:e1006913. PubMed
  133. Yoshida H, et al. 2019. Cell. 176:897. PubMed
  134. Riedel SS, et al. 2021. Molecular Cell. 81(11):2332-2348.e9. PubMed
  135. Rossnagl S, et al. 2016. PLoS Biol. 14: 1002562. PubMed
  136. Matsuzaki Y, et al. 2015. Biomed Rep. 1: 91 - 97. PubMed
  137. Säwen P et al. 2018. eLife. 7 pii: e41258. PubMed
  138. Luo H, et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 26:945. PubMed
  139. Heyde A, et al. 2021. Cell. 184(5):1348-1361.e22. PubMed
  140. Huang X, et al. 2021. Immunity. . PubMed
  141. Li ZG, et al. 2020. Chin Med J (Engl). 1943:133. PubMed
  142. O'Boyle C, et al. 2020. Int J Stroke. 0.746527778. PubMed
  143. Celias DP, et al. 2022. STAR Protoc. 3:101464. PubMed
  144. Liao YC, et al. 2021. Front Immunol. 12:743030. PubMed
  145. Davis FM, et al. 2021. J Exp Med. 218:. PubMed
  146. Bae S, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 35(11):109264. PubMed
  147. Young K, et al. 2021. Cell Stem Cell. . PubMed
  148. Zysset D, et al. 2016. Nat Commun. 7:13151. PubMed
  149. Seong J, et al. 2018. Development. 145:14. PubMed
  150. Johnson JL et al. 2018. Immunity. 48(2):243-257 . PubMed
RRID
AB_313704 (BioLegend Cat. No. 116203)
AB_313705 (BioLegend Cat. No. 116204)

Antigen Details

Structure
Associated with glycophorin A, 52 kD
Distribution

Early proerythroblast to mature erythrocyte, but not BFU-E and CFU-E

Cell Type
Erythrocytes
Biology Area
Immunology
Antigen References

1. Kina T, et al. 2000. Br. J. Haematol. 109:280.
2. Ikuta K, et al. 1990. Cell 62:863.
3. Osawa M, et al. 1996. Weir's Handbook of Experimental Immunology. Vol. 2 pp. 66.1-66.5.

Gene ID
104231 View all products for this Gene ID
UniProt
View information about TER-119 on UniProt.org

Related FAQs

How many biotin molecules are per antibody structure?
We don't routinely measure the number of biotins with our antibody products but the number of biotin molecules range from 3-6 molecules per antibody.

Other Formats

View All TER-119 Reagents Request Custom Conjugation
Description Clone Applications
APC anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Biotin anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
FITC anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
PE anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
PE/Cyanine5 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Purified anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC,IHC-F,IHC-P,IP,WB
Alexa Fluor® 488 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Alexa Fluor® 647 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Alexa Fluor® 700 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
APC/Cyanine7 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
PerCP anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 421™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Pacific Blue™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 650™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 510™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 605™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Purified anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells (Maxpar® Ready) TER-119 FC,CyTOF®
PE/Dazzle™ 594 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 785™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
TotalSeq™-A0122 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 PG
APC/Fire™ 750 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
TotalSeq™-B0122 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 PG
TotalSeq™-C0122 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 PG
Ultra-LEAF™ Purified anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC,IHC-F,IHC-P,IP,WB,CMCD
Spark Blue™ 550 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
APC/Fire™ 810 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Spark NIR™ 685 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells Antibody TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 711™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Go To Top Version: 3    Revision Date: 12.04.2013

For Research Use Only. Not for diagnostic or therapeutic use.

 

This product is supplied subject to the terms and conditions, including the limited license, located at www.biolegend.com/terms) ("Terms") and may be used only as provided in the Terms. Without limiting the foregoing, BioLegend products may not be used for any Commercial Purpose as defined in the Terms, resold in any form, used in manufacturing, or reverse engineered, sequenced, or otherwise studied or used to learn its design or composition without express written approval of BioLegend. Regardless of the information given in this document, user is solely responsible for determining any license requirements necessary for user’s intended use and assumes all risk and liability arising from use of the product. BioLegend is not responsible for patent infringement or any other risks or liabilities whatsoever resulting from the use of its products.

 

BioLegend, the BioLegend logo, and all other trademarks are property of BioLegend, Inc. or their respective owners, and all rights are reserved.

 

8999 BioLegend Way, San Diego, CA 92121 www.biolegend.com
Toll-Free Phone: 1-877-Bio-Legend (246-5343) Phone: (858) 768-5800 Fax: (877) 455-9587

This data display is provided for general comparisons between formats.
Your actual data may vary due to variations in samples, target cells, instruments and their settings, staining conditions, and other factors.
If you need assistance with selecting the best format contact our expert technical support team.

ProductsHere
Login / Register
Remember me
Forgot your password? Reset password?
Create an Account